Thin vs thick ear cartilage: which patch heals better?

NCT ID NCT07471191

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of cartilage grafts used to repair eardrum holes in adults. One graft is thin (0.5 mm) and the other is thick (1.8 mm). The goal is to see which one leads to better healing and hearing after six months. Thirty adults with long-standing eardrum perforations will take part.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
tragal cartilage graft (partial-thickness or full-thickness)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that using a thinner cartilage graft improves eardrum healing rates and hearing outcomes after surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study hasn't started recruiting yet, and there is always a chance the thinner graft could be less durable.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA WITH TYMPANIC MEMBRANE PERFORATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.