A second chance for the heart: can rehab rewrite the story after shock?
NCT ID NCT06572826
First seen Sep 02, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether a structured cardiac rehabilitation program can improve outcomes for people who survived a cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening condition where the heart suddenly fails to pump enough blood. Researchers will enroll 2,000 patients across Italy and compare those who follow the rehab program with those who receive standard care. The program includes tailored exercise, breathing training, and lifestyle guidance. The goal is to see if rehab reduces deaths and hospital readmissions, and improves quality of life and ability to return to work.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Cardiac rehabilitation program including respiratory physiotherapy, muscle strengthening, aerobic training, and lifestyle counseling
- What this could lead to
- If it works, structured cardiac rehab could become a standard part of recovery after cardiogenic shock, improving survival, reducing hospital readmissions, and helping patients regain function and quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational and interventional study, not a randomized controlled trial, so results may be influenced by patient differences. The benefits of rehab after shock are not yet proven, and participation requires patient commitment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 2,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
All consecutive patients with Cardiogenic Shock (CS) will be included. The deferred consent is admitted for non-competent patients.
- Ages
-
18 to 110 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: • All consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of Cardiogenic Shock. Exclusion Criteria: • Refusal to give informed consent.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cardiogenic shock are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fondazione Don Gnocchi
RECRUITINGMilan, 20148, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood filter may calm the deadly inflammation of cardiogenic shock
- Microscopic blood vessel health may hold key to cardiogenic shock survival
- Can a machine support a failing heart without overworking it?
- Blood markers may sharpen prognosis in cardiogenic shock
- Can an external heart pump keep shock patients alive?
- Can a temporary heart pump save more lives in cardiogenic shock?