A chill buzz vs. a needle: can a device replace a drug for Kids' pain?

NCT ID NCT07770581

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 18, 2026 · Last updated Aug 19, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether a vibrating cold device called Buzzy can reduce the pain children feel when receiving propofol, a common anesthesia drug. Propofol often stings when injected, and the standard prevention is a lidocaine injection beforehand. The study will compare the Buzzy device to lidocaine in children aged 12 to 17, using pain scales and vital signs to see if the device works just as well without adding another drug.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Buzzy personal pain relief device (a vibrating cold device) compared with intravenous lidocaine
What this could lead to
If effective, the Buzzy device could offer a drug-free way to reduce injection pain in children, avoiding extra medications.
What could go wrong
The trial is small and early, and the device may not work as well as lidocaine. Pain is subjective, and results may not apply to all children.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

49 people

The number who actually took part.

Start date

Jun 2014

Finished

Jun 2017

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

12 to 17 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients who are in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I to III (meaning healthy patients, patients with mild systemic disease, and patients with serious controlled systemic disease) between the ages of 12 and 17 presenting from home for procedures including, but not limited to, upper and lower endoscopy, orthopedic surgery, and medical imaging will be enrolled. Exclusion Criteria: Based on history and physical examination, patients requiring a rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and patients requiring an emergency procedure will be excluded. Standard institutional practice is to place IVs in children over 12 before surgery. There are some patients who, due to needle phobia, may prefer a mask induction of anesthesia, but at this age, but this is the exception rather than the rule. If a child was determined to require a mask induction, they would be excluded from the study.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Propofol injection pain in children are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States