Which spinal anesthetic gets you back on your feet sooner?
NCT ID NCT07777055
First seen Aug 20, 2026 · Last updated Aug 25, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two common spinal anesthetics, bupivacaine and ropivacaine, to see which one wears off faster, allowing patients to move their legs sooner after lower limb surgery. The study involves adults having elective orthopedic procedures and measures how long each drug blocks movement and sensation. The goal is to find out if ropivacaine truly offers a quicker recovery, as earlier research suggests.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Spinal anesthesia with either 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine
- What this could lead to
- If one drug proves better, it could lead to faster recovery and earlier mobility after surgery, improving patient comfort and hospital efficiency.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial, and results may not apply to all patients. Both drugs have known risks like low blood pressure and temporary leg weakness.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
64 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2018
- Finished
-
Nov 2019
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. AGE: \>18 years\>65years 2. All ASA I and II patients 3. Undergoing elective orthopaedic surgeries 4. No contraindications for spinal anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: 1. pregnancy, 2. obesity, 3. ASA III and IV, 4. emergency surgeries.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Spinal anesthesia are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Institute of Medicine
Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a One-Sided spinal block keep blood pressure steadier during hip surgery?
- Can a slower oxytocin infusion prevent dangerous blood pressure drops in C-Sections?
- Can ultrasound make spinal anesthesia safer for the elderly?
- Can AI-Guided ultrasound make spinal anesthesia safer?
- Simple steroid shot before C-Section could cut Post-Op pain and opioid use
- Eye reflex may flag hidden risk in cesarean births