Study tests which breathing aid is better for struggling kids

NCT ID NCT07336121

Summary

This study compared two common methods of non-invasive breathing support for young children (aged 1 month to 5 years) who were in the pediatric intensive care unit with severe breathing problems from pneumonia or bronchiolitis. Researchers wanted to see which method—High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) or nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP)—was more effective at improving lung function and which was better tolerated by the children. They measured results using daily lung ultrasounds and a standard pain/discomfort scale.

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BRONCHIOLITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Pediatric Intensive Care Units, Children Hospital, Ain shams university

    Cairo, 00002, Egypt

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.