Bone injection vs. IV drip: new fight against amputation infections
NCT ID NCT07338773
Summary
This study is testing if giving a preventive antibiotic directly into the bone during surgery works better than giving it through a standard IV drip to stop infections after a diabetic foot amputation. People with diabetes often have poor blood flow in their legs, which might stop enough antibiotic from reaching the surgical site through the veins. Researchers will randomly assign 40 patients to get the antibiotic either in the bone or in a vein and then follow them for 90 days to see which method better prevents infections and protects kidney function.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DIABETIC FOOT INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Basaksehir Cam ve Sakura City Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.