C-Section anesthesia study: which is safer for the heart?
NCT ID NCT07524296
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study looked at 50 pregnant women having planned C-sections to see whether spinal or general anesthesia has less effect on the heart's electrical activity (QTc interval). Participants received one type of anesthesia and were monitored with an ECG. The goal was to help doctors choose the safer option for the heart during delivery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CESAREAN BIRTH are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Haseki Traininng and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A simple conversation bundle might curb the global rise in c-sections
- Will a Color-Coded dashboard expose and fix racial gaps in labor care?
- A new care protocol aims to support pregnant women in disaster zones
- Could a hidden back tissue hold the key to pelvic pain in pregnancy?
- Pregnancy's hidden strain: measuring the Back's inner support tissue
- Home kit boosts emotional bond between parents and unborn baby