Can AI write better emergency room notes than doctors?
NCT ID NCT07804407
First seen Sep 04, 2026 · Last updated Sep 04, 2026
Summary
This trial asks whether an AI tool that listens to and transcribes doctor-patient conversations can draft a more complete medical history than a doctor's usual notes. Researchers will compare unedited AI drafts with standard physician-written histories from about 100 emergency department visits. Independent doctors, who do not know which note is which, will review both versions for accuracy and completeness.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- EDnote, an on-premise AI tool that transcribes patient-physician conversations and drafts a history of present illness
- What this could lead to
- If AI drafts capture more clinical facts, they could support doctors by improving documentation accuracy and saving time in busy emergency departments.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center observational study, so results may not apply broadly. AI drafts may miss nuances or contain errors, and the study does not measure patient outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 100 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients presenting to the emergency department of a single tertiary teaching hospital in Korea.
- Ages
-
19 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥19 years; presenting to the emergency department; initial encounter documented with EDnote; verbal consent to study participation. Exclusion Criteria: * Cardiac arrest; limited ability of both patient and guardian to communicate verbally; refusal of participation.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for All emergency department visits meeting eligibility criteria are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Yonsei University Severance Hospital
RECRUITINGSeoul, Seoul City, 03722, South Korea