AI could replace eye drops for measuring nearsightedness
NCT ID NCT07690813
First seen Jul 08, 2026 · Last updated Sep 21, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study tests a machine learning model that predicts how much nearsightedness a person has without using dilating eye drops. The model uses standard eye measurements like autorefraction and corneal shape. If accurate, it could make eye exams quicker and more comfortable for adults with myopia.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Machine learning model for predicting cycloplegic refraction
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could make eye exams faster and more comfortable by reducing the need for dilating drops, while still accurately identifying patients who need them.
- What could go wrong
- The model may not be accurate enough for all patients, and it is tested only in adults with specific degrees of myopia, so results may not apply to everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 2,500 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Nov 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Each subject underwent a comprehensive preoperative examination, including cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractions, Pentacam, etc.
- Ages
-
18 to 47 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 to 60 years, of either sex; 2. Spherical equivalent between -0.50 diopters and -10.00 diopters, with myopia in one or both eyes, and with cylinder of 4.00 diopters or less; 3. Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye; 4. Clear cornea, no keratoconus, corneal scarring, or other pathologies; clear lens; 5. Intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, with no history of glaucoma; 6. No history of ocular surgery, especially corneal refractive surgery or cataract surgery; 7. Time interval between non-cycloplegic refraction and cycloplegic refraction of 7 days or less, with complete data. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Incomplete clinical data to support the diagnosis; 2. Ocular conditions such as subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, or moderate-to-severe corneal haze or leukoma; 3. Allergy or contraindication to cycloplegic agents; 4. Refusal to participate in the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Accommodation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi 330000
RECRUITINGJiangxi, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two lens designs go Head-to-Head for aging eyes
- Can AI protect Kids' eyesight where eye doctors are scarce?
- Two toric lenses go head to head in vision test
- Eye scans as a window to the body: study probes retinal imaging across diseases
- Lens showdown: which contact lens wins in dim light?
- Myopia glasses may keep working even after kids take them off