AI in science: what do leading medical authors really think?
NCT ID NCT07326501
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study surveys 500 corresponding authors from top medical journals to understand their attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported use of artificial intelligence in research. Participants complete an anonymous online questionnaire about AI tools for idea generation, literature review, data analysis, writing, and publishing. The goal is to gather insights that could shape future ethical guidelines and journal policies—no medical treatment or health data is involved.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de NICE
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a glimpse of the eye reveal What's happening in the lungs?
- Can AI read the hidden clues in mammograms?
- Can AI read heart scans as well as experts?
- Robot tutor aims to help kids master asthma inhalers
- Artificial intelligence may detect Children's heart disease from a routine ECG
- AI tutors put to the test: can chatbots boost grades better than showing up to class?