AI in science: what do leading medical authors really think?

NCT ID NCT07326501

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study surveys 500 corresponding authors from top medical journals to understand their attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported use of artificial intelligence in research. Participants complete an anonymous online questionnaire about AI tools for idea generation, literature review, data analysis, writing, and publishing. The goal is to gather insights that could shape future ethical guidelines and journal policies—no medical treatment or health data is involved.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de NICE

    Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.