AI vs. traditional teaching: which boosts critical thinking in nurses?

NCT ID NCT07538986

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Xi Cao Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen May 05, 2026 · Last updated May 28, 2026 · Updated 5 times

Summary

This study looks at whether using AI to analyze cases and find errors can improve critical thinking, AI skills, and clinical reasoning in nursing students. About 400 students will be split into two groups: one gets AI-based training, the other gets traditional case-based teaching. Their thinking skills will be measured before and after the training to see which method works better.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Chengdu Medical College

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.