Newer adenoid surgery technique may be safer and more precise

NCT ID NCT07417007

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Medipol University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two surgical methods for removing adenoids in 128 children: the traditional cold curettage and a newer coblation technique using endoscopes. The goal was to see which method leaves less leftover tissue and causes fewer complications. The coblation method uses special tools to precisely remove tissue while minimizing bleeding.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Surgical procedure (cold curettage or coblation-assisted adenoidectomy)
What this could lead to: If coblation proves better, it could become the preferred method for adenoid removal, reducing complications and the need for repeat surgery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study comparing two established techniques. The results may not apply to all hospitals or patients, and coblation requires special equipment and training.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ADENOID HYPERTROPHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

adenoid hypertrophy Halitosis Pain, Postoperative

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ENDOSCOPIC COBLATION ADENOIDECTOMY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University.

Istanbul, Bagcılar, 34214, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.