Knee surgery showdown: which ACL fix works best?
NCT ID NCT07318272
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two surgeries for a torn ACL: the standard reconstruction and a newer repair technique. Researchers will measure muscle strength, knee stability, and balance in 45 adults who had one of these surgeries at least a year ago. The goal is to find which approach leads to better recovery and help doctors create personalized rehab plans.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT (ACL) TEAR are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
RECRUITINGAnkara, Çankaya, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can the ankle fully recover after donating a tendon for ACL repair?
- Can magnetic pulses rebuild hamstring strength after ACL surgery?
- Nerve block showdown: which technique offers better pain control after knee surgery?
- Robotic knee tester aims to outdo the human hand in measuring ACL injuries
- Video game for the brain: could neurofeedback supercharge Post-Surgery recovery?
- Can a simple test predict ACL tears in teen soccer stars?