← Back to home

ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH

Clinical trials for ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH explained in plain language.

Never miss a new study

Get alerted when new ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH trials appear

Sign up with your email to follow new studies for ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH, keep track of the ones that matter, and come back to a personal dashboard instead of checking manually.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Not yet recruiting 1

Tooth study tests which root canal prep is more accurate

Knowledge-focused Not yet recruiting

This lab study compares two ways to prepare a root canal before cleaning it: using hand files or a mechanical rotary tool. Researchers will test 60 extracted single-rooted teeth to see which method keeps the working length more accurate. The goal is to improve root canal success,…

Matched conditions: ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH

Phase: NA • Sponsor: Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences • Aim: Knowledge-focused

Last updated Jul 02, 2026 08:00 UTC

ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH

Get alerted when new ACHIEVEMENT OF WORKING LENGTH AFTER MANUAL VERSUS MECHANICAL GLIDE PATH trials appear

Tooth study tests which root canal prep is more accurate