Vitamin d showdown: which pill works best?
NCT ID NCT07317830
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two different vitamin D3 supplements to see which one raises vitamin D levels faster and more effectively in adults who are low in vitamin D. About 20 people will take one of the two supplements daily for eight weeks. The goal is to find the best way to correct vitamin D deficiency.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 20 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Dec 2025
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years and over * Serum 25(OH)D \< 75 nmol/L * BMI 18.5 - 29.9 kg/m2 * Free of clinically significant acute disorders and severe chronic diseases * No planned travel to high-UV destinations or tanning bed use during the trial * Willing to avoid non-study vitamin D supplements * Able to give written informed consent and comply with study visits * Submitted informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy of breast feeding * Underweight or obesity * History of any dietary supplement use within 8 weeks before screening * Medications that materially alter vitamin D metabolism or calcium balance * Subjects with a history of medicine or alcohol abuse * Abnormal values for lab clinical chemistry (\> 2 SD) * Unwillingness to return for follow-up analysis * Participation in other clinical trials within 60 days prior to screening
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Vitamin D deficiency are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Center for Health Sciences
RECRUITINGBelgrade, 11000, Serbia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could vitamin d play a role in sleep apnea severity?
- One vitamin a pill before transplant: a new shield against a deadly complication?
- Could your bone health decide if a dental implant lasts?
- Could vitamin d levels influence asthma control?
- Could vitamin d levels influence cholesterol in obese diabetes patients?
- Vitamin d deficiency may undermine dental implants — trial tests if supplements can fix it