Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

VR training beats traditional methods for teaching nursing students physical exams

NCT ID NCT06536361

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 11, 2026 · Updated 4 times

Summary

This study tested whether virtual reality (VR) simulation helps nursing students learn respiratory physical exams better than traditional small-group practice. 76 second-year students were randomly assigned to either VR training using an Oculus headset or hands-on practice in a lab. Both groups improved, but the VR group showed significantly greater gains in knowledge and skill, though they took longer to complete the exam. Students also rated the VR tool as easy to use and effective.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Virtual reality simulation using Oculus Meta Quest 3 headset
What this could lead to
If successful, this approach could become a standard teaching tool for nursing education, improving how students learn physical exam skills.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with 76 students, so results may not apply broadly. The VR group took longer to perform exams, which could be a drawback in real-world training.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

76 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

May 2024

Finished

Jul 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria for the Study The student must: * Voluntarily participate in the study, * Not have difficulty understanding and speaking Turkish, * Not have refractive errors that can affect depth perception, such as amblyopia (lazy eye), anisometropia (different refractive errors of the two eyes), and strabismus (crossed eyes) (Chan et al., 2023). (The individual's self-declaration was used to determine refractive errors. Individuals with these refractive errors were not included in the study because focal eye adjustment was required, but this adjustment was not supported on the Oculus 2 device. Individuals with other refractive errors were able to use the application with their glasses). * Have a general academic achievement score between 2.00 and 4.00, * Have taken the Health Assessment course for the first time in the 2023-2024 academic year and passed this course with at least a CC grade (CC indicates minimum success; grades below indicate conditional passing). Exclusion criteria from the study: The student must: * Have a high school, associate's degree, or bachelor's degree in a health-related field, * Be retaking the Health Assessment course (code HEM 205). Criteria for removal from the study: The student must: * Want to withdraw from the study, * Not attend the theoretical thoracic and pulmonary physical examination course, * Not watch the thoracic and pulmonary physical examination demonstration videos, * Not attend the practical lessons, * Not fill out and/or incompletely fill out the data collection forms, * Not use the virtual reality-based learning tool, * Not participate in any stage of the skills assessment.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Exanimation are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Coma

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gazi University Nursing Faculty

    Ankara, Ankara, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.