Please sign in to follow a disease.
Hernia surgery showdown: laparoscopic vs. open vs. robotic
NCT ID NCT04437043
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study looked at 100 patients with midline ventral hernias to compare three repair methods: laparoscopic, open, and robotic. The main goal was to see how many days patients spent in the hospital within 90 days after surgery. Researchers also tracked complications like infections and hernia recurrence to find the safest and most effective approach.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (laparoscopic, open, or robotic ventral hernia repair)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help surgeons choose the best hernia repair method to reduce hospital stays and complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed observational study with no new treatment; results may not apply to all hernia types or patients with complex conditions.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
100 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2020
- Finished
-
May 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with incisional midline ventral hernia (M2: epigastric, M3: umbilical, M4: infra-umbilical) with a minimal width of 3 cm and a maximum width of 8 cm. Multiple hernia defects (Swiss cheese) are allowed according to European Hernia Society (EHS) classification (Appendix 1). 2. Recurrences are only allowed to be included after former primary repair (suture repair without mesh). 3. Patients with ASA grade I to III. 4. Patient is at least 18 years old. 5. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment. 6. Patient is able to tolerate general anesthesia. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. 2. Patient is suspected of being unable to comply with the study protocol. 3. Patient is pregnant. 4. Patient needs acute surgery. 5. Patient is enrolled in another study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ventral hernia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, East Flanders, 9000, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can we predict mesh infections before they happen? a new study aims to find out
- Which hernia repair technique causes less pain? a trial puts two methods Head-to-Head
- Can a robot help heal large hernias faster? a trial puts it to the test
- Can a flap made from the hernia sac itself prevent mesh complications?
- Could a muscle relaxant cut opioid use after hernia surgery?
- Physical therapy after hernia surgery shows promise in small trial