Ultrasound may make spinal anesthesia safer for obese moms during C-Sections
NCT ID NCT07601542
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two methods of giving spinal anesthesia to 60 obese women having a planned C-section: one using ultrasound to find the right spot, and the other using traditional touch-based landmarks. The goal was to see if ultrasound reduces the number of needle sticks, procedure time, and side effects like headaches or back pain. Participants were followed for three months after delivery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia procedure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could make spinal anesthesia safer and more efficient for obese women undergoing C-sections, reducing needle attempts and complications like headaches.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or settings. The ultrasound technique may not significantly improve outcomes over the traditional method.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Feb 2025
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Elective caesarean section * ASA physical status: Ⅱ * Obese parturient (BMI ≥ 30.1 kg/m²) Exclusion Criteria: * Allergic to local anaesthetic (0.5% Bupivacaine hydrochloride with 8% Dextrose and 2 % Lidocaine hydrochloride USP) * Preexisting neurological deficit by clinical examination * Any contraindication to SAB * History of scoliosis or spinal instrumentation * Allergy to ultrasound transmission gel
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cesarean section are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bangladesh Medical University
Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can childbirth education cut unnecessary C-Sections?
- Two common drugs face off to shield mothers from a dangerous drop in blood pressure
- Can simple recovery checklists after cesarean boost patient well-being?
- Can we predict severe pain after C-Section?
- Can a slower oxytocin infusion prevent dangerous blood pressure drops in C-Sections?
- Can an AI chatbot calm nerves before a C-Section as well as a doctor?