Cheaper bladder test could replace costly MRI scans
NCT ID NCT06323109
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at whether a simple ultrasound can do the same job as an MRI for measuring how well the bladder works in people with lower urinary tract symptoms (like trouble urinating). Researchers will compare results from both scans in 80 adults. If ultrasound works, it could become a cheaper and more available way to diagnose bladder problems.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 80 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
1. Men diagnosed with BPH/LUTS 2. Healthy volunteers
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with BPH/LUTS * Age 18-80 years old * Diagnosed with BPH/LUTS with or without obstruction Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with contraindication to MRI and/or GBCA contrast agent. Diabetic subjects will not receive contrast. * History of overt neurologic disease other than diabetic neuropathy, urinary tract infection within the last 4 weeks or recent history of urinary retention (within the last 4 weeks). Inclusion Criteria: Healthy Volunteers \- Age 18-80 years old not experiencing any symptoms consistent with LUTS Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with contraindication to MRI and/or GBCA contrast agent. * Currently taking medications with known effects on the bladder, overt neurologic disease other than diabetic neuropathy, urinary tract infection within the last 4 weeks or urinary retention symptoms.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BPH are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The study's own enquiry address
This study publishes an address for enquiries. See it below .
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
University of Wisconsin
RECRUITINGMadison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a fluid injection make prostate surgery safer and less bloody?
- Can a two-drug combo better tame prostate trouble?
- Can adjusting drug schedules improve both urinary and sexual outcomes in men with enlarged prostate?
- Simple exercise before prostate surgery may prevent incontinence
- Laser surgery before radiation may ease urinary troubles in prostate cancer patients
- Soothing sounds and soft lights may ease patient nerves during bladder exams