Which brace works best? small study pits twinblock against monoblock
NCT ID NCT07277543
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This completed study looked at 18 girls aged 9 to 12 with a type of jaw misalignment called skeletal Class II. Researchers compared two dental devices—twinblock and monoblock—to see which one better corrected the jaw and teeth position. Participants wore the device for 15 hours a day after an initial bite adjustment. The goal was to find out which appliance leads to better skeletal and dental changes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- twinblock and monoblock orthodontic appliances
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show which device works better for correcting jaw alignment in growing children, potentially improving treatment choices.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 18 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. It compares devices, not a new treatment, so impact is limited.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
18 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
9 to 12 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients to avoid any sexual dimorphism which may affect the comparison. * Skeletal Class II (ANB° \> 5°) with normal maxilla (SNA° = 82° ±4°) and retrognathic mandible (SNB° \< 87°). * Age range from 9 to 12 years. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous history of orthodontic treatment. * Congenitally missing or extracted permanent teeth. * Posterior cross bites or severe maxillary transverse deficiency. * Severe facial asymmetry determined by clinical or radiographic examination. * Poor oral hygiene. * Systemic diseases that may affect the treatment results.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dentoskeletal changes in skeletal classii are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Shimaa Nasr
Cairo, Egypt