Knee surgery showdown: which approach heals broken shins faster?
NCT ID NCT07657559
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two surgical methods for fixing a broken shinbone (tibia). One technique enters above the kneecap, the other from the side of the kneecap. Researchers will measure knee function, pain, and recovery in 40 adults aged 18-60. The goal is to find which approach leads to better outcomes after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (suprapatellar approach vs extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach)
- What this could lead to
- If one approach proves better, it could become the preferred technique for treating tibial fractures, leading to faster recovery and less knee pain.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Surgery always carries risks like infection or complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 40 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * age 18-60 years * tibial shaft fractures Exclusion Criteria: * pervious knee injury * open fracture at least Gustilo grade II * ipsilateral femur and ankle fractures
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Intramedullary nail are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple sensor prevent a rare but dangerous complication in teen leg fractures?
- Do antibiotic-coated nails prevent infections in broken legs? a new study looks back at 15 years of data.
- Gene study aims to unlock why some leg fractures lead to dangerous muscle swelling
- Can a common bleeding drug help trauma patients on blood thinners?
- Massive study follows 1,000 kids with fractures to find best treatments