Heart valve showdown: TAVI vs surgery in Mid-Risk patients
NCT ID NCT03112980
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ways to replace a narrowed heart valve in people with severe aortic stenosis who are at intermediate risk for surgery. About 1,400 participants will be randomly assigned to get either a less invasive TAVI procedure or open-heart surgery (SAVR). The main goal is to see if TAVI is as good as surgery at preventing death or stroke over 1 and 5 years.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
1,414 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2017
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
65 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Heart team consensus that TAVI and SAVR are both medically justified and advisable based on: 1. Degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiographically derived criteria: * Mean gradient \>40 mmHg or * Jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s or * Aortic valve area (AVA) of \< 1.0 cm2 (indexed effective orifice area \< 0.6cm2/m2). 2. Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis * New York Heart Association Functional Class ≥ II or * Angina pectoris or * Syncope. 3. Patient is classified as low to intermediate operative risk as assessed by the local heart team according to the variables outlined in the 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of valvular heart disease, taking into account cardiac and extracardiac Patient characteristics and established risk scores (e.g. STS-PROM, EuroSCORE). 4. A transfemoral or alternative (e.g. transapical, transaortic, transaxillary) access for TAVI seems feasible. Centers should follow a "transfemoral first" strategy for the primary route of access; however, other routes of access are also allowed, as decided by local heart team consensus. 2. Patient has provided written informed consent to participate in the trial. 3. Ability of the patient to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in the study, before performing any study related procedures. 4. The patient agrees to undergo SAVR, if randomized to control treatment. 5. The patient and the treating physician agree that the patient will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits. 6. Patients aged 65 to 85 years. 7. Male patients or females who are postmenopausal defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve, or is non-calcified 2. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease considered a contraindication to an isolated aortic valve procedure (TAVI or SAVR) according to heart team consensus 3. Previous cardiac surgery 4. Any percutaneous coronary intervention performed within 1 month prior to the study procedure 5. Untreated severe mitral or tricuspid regurgitation 6. Untreated severe mitral stenosis 7. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical circulatory support 8. Ischemic stroke or intracranial bleeding within 1 month 9. Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 20% as measured by resting echocardiogram 10. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or severe basal septal hypertrophy with outflow gradient 11. Echocardiographic evidence of an intracardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation or endocarditis 12. Any other condition considered a contraindication for an isolated aortic valve procedure 13. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease 14. Expected life expectancy \< 12 months due to associated non-cardiac comorbidities 15. Currently participating in another investigational drug or device trial
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic valve stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz
Koblenz, 56076, Germany
-
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Benjamin-Franklin)
Berlin, Germany
-
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Mitte)
Berlin, Germany
-
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow)
Berlin, Germany
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
Berlin, Germany
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
München, Germany
-
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Bad Oeynhausen
Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
-
Herz- und Gefässklinik Bad Neustadt/Saale
Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
-
Herzzentrum Dresden an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, Germany
-
Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln
Cologne, Germany
-
Immanuel Klinikum Bernau
Bernau, 16321, Germany
-
Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, Germany
-
Kliniken der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Bochum, Germany
-
LMU Klinikum der Universität München
München, Germany
-
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane
Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
-
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
-
Otto-von Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Magdeburg, Germany
-
Robert Bosch Krankenhaus
Stuttgart, Germany
-
Uniklinik Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen
Aachen, Germany
-
Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg (UHZ)
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20251, Germany
-
Universitäres Herzzentrum Lübeck
Lübeck, Germany
-
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Germany
-
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinikum für Kardiologie und Angiologie am Westdeutschen Herz- und Gefäßzentrum
Essen, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg
Giessen, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Göttingen
Göttingen, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
Halle, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Regensburg, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, Germany
-
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald / Klinikum Karlsburg
Karlsburg, Germany
-
Universitätsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, Germany
-
Vivantes Friedrichshain
Berlin, Germany
-
Vivantes Humboldt Kliniken
Berlin, Germany
-
Vivantes Klinikum am Urban
Berlin, Germany
-
Vivantes Neukölln
Berlin, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can aggressive blood pressure treatment slow aortic valve disease?
- Why do animal heart valves wear out? immune system under investigation
- One scan to rule them all? new CT aims to replace multiple heart tests
- Which heart valve design wins for small aortic openings?
- Can a less invasive valve replacement tame a failing aortic valve?
- Can a new heart valve match the safety of proven ones?