Floss vs brush: which keeps implant gums healthier?
NCT ID NCT06923748
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two cleaning tools—superfloss and interdental brushes—in 52 adults with gum inflammation around dental implants. Each person used one tool daily along with an electric toothbrush. Researchers measured plaque and bleeding to see which worked better. The goal is to find the best way to keep implant gums healthy.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- superfloss and interdental brush
- What this could lead to
- If one device proves better, dentists may recommend a specific cleaning tool to help control gum inflammation around implants.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 52 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and neither device can cure implant disease—only help manage it.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
52 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2025
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 70 years * Presence of at least one implant loaded for ≥1 year * Presence of bleeding (≥1 site or line/profuse bleeding) and/or suppuration on gentle probing around the implant * Systemically healthy adults * Able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Use of anticoagulants, anti-aggregants, antibiotics, or corticosteroids in the past 3 months * Pregnant or lactating women * Inability to perform adequate oral hygiene
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Peri implant mucositis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AOUS
Siena, 53100, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Does implant length change the risk of gum inflammation?
- Do dental implant cleanings shed titanium? scientists measure metal particles in four treatment methods
- Can a bone graft rescue failing dental implants?
- Can a Cow-Bone graft save failing dental implants?
- Can Air-Polishing save ailing dental implants?
- Can a spermidine gel soothe inflamed gums around dental implants?