Bystander stories may speed stroke diagnosis
NCT ID NCT07277790
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether emergency physicians can accurately predict stroke by interviewing witnesses who saw the symptoms start. Researchers asked 235 witnesses to describe what they observed, then compared the doctors' scores to brain scans. The goal was to see if this method could help reduce delays in getting stroke patients to the hospital.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help emergency teams use witness reports to quickly identify strokes and reduce delays in getting patients to treatment.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed observational study, not a treatment trial. The approach may not be accurate enough for real-world use or may not generalize beyond this hospital setting.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
235 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study population was stroke witnesses (family members, friends, neighbors, or bystanders) who observed the patient's initial symptoms and accompanied the patient to the emergency department with acute suspected stroke symptoms.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years * Witnessing onset/discovery of stroke-like symptoms * Accompanying the patient to the ED * Being the individual who decided to call EMS or arrange transport * No cognitive impairment affecting communication * Not a healthcare professional * Patient requiring advanced neuroimaging (CT/MRI) * Provided written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<18 years * Did not witness symptoms * Cognitive impairment limiting communication * Did not make the action decision * Healthcare professionals * Patients transferred with pre-confirmed stroke * Lack of consent or withdrawal * Missing/incomplete CPSS scoring items
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ischemic stroke are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine
Çankaya, Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a checklist and heart monitor stop repeat strokes?
- Heart hole or stroke trigger? global registry tracks who gets closure and what happens next
- Two ways to catch a hidden heart rhythm after stroke
- Blood test may reveal who recovers after a stroke
- Can a smart bracelet and app stop a second stroke?
- Pharmacist and coach team takes aim at blood pressure after stroke