Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Spleen injury showdown: keyhole surgery vs artery blocking

NCT ID NCT07274007

Disease control Sponsor: Zagazig University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two procedures for treating grade III spleen injuries in stable patients: laparoscopic splenectomy (keyhole removal of the spleen) and splenic artery embolization (blocking the artery to stop bleeding). Researchers will track complications, recovery time, and quality of life in 24 participants to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Laparoscopic splenectomy (surgical removal of the spleen) or splenic artery embolization (blocking blood flow to the spleen via a catheter)
What this could lead to
If this trial shows one method is better, it could help doctors choose the safest, most effective way to treat severe spleen injuries without open surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures have risks like infection, bleeding, or complications from anesthesia.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

24 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Dec 2024

Expected to finish

Nov 2025

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

12 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged above 12 years at time of screening. * Patients diagnosed with grade three traumatic Splenic Injury Exclusion Criteria: * Patients aged less than 12 years at time of screening . * Patients diagnosed with associated visceral injury such as "liver,kidney,bowel, etc..". * Patients diagnosed with isolated splenic injury after trauma other than grades III * Patients contraindicated for radiological investigations or splenic artery embolization using interventional radiology such as pregnany

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Grade III traumatic splenic injury in hemodynamically stable patients are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Grade III traumatic splenic injury in hemodynamically stable patients

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Zagazig university,Faculty of medicine

    Zagazig, Egypt