Which spine cage stays put? study compares expandable vs static implants
NCT ID NCT05536453
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked back at 465 patients who had lumbar spine fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease. Researchers compared two types of implants (expandable cages and static cages) to see which ones were less likely to sink into the bone after surgery. The goal is to help surgeons choose the best device to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Lumbar interbody fusion devices (expandable and static cages)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help surgeons choose better-designed spine implants that are less likely to sink into the bone after fusion surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a retrospective review of past surgeries, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by patient selection or surgeon technique. The findings may not apply to all patients or newer devices.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
465 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2022
- Finished
-
Jul 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Skeletally mature individuals with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1, who were treated with TLIF or PLIF surgery using an EXP or STC IBFD according to the surgeon's and patient's choice, as part of the standard of care.
- Ages
-
18 to 110 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1\. The patient was treated with TLIF or PLIF surgery using the IBFD according to the cleared labeling, based on the surgeon's clinical judgment and patient-specific decision making. Based on the product labeling, the patient must: 1. Was at least 18 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery 2. Had clinical and radiological evidence of DDD of the lumbar spine 3. Undergone treatment with the IBFD with autogenous bone graft and/or allogeneic bone graft composed of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone at 1 or 2 contiguous levels from L2 to S1 Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of fusion surgery or large laminectomy at L2 to S1 prior to treatment with the IBFD(s) Spondylolisthesis unable to be reduced to grade 1 as part of the surgical procedure 2. Surgery with the IBFD(s) at more than 2 contiguous levels 3. Surgery with the IBFD(s) at levels outside the range of L2 to S1 4. Treated with any bone grafting material other than autogenous or allogenic bone graft in the device(s) or surrounding disc space 5. Any contraindications listed in the cleared product labeling 6. Osteoporosis, Other Systemic Bone D.O. T score ≤ -1.5 7. BMI \> 40 8. Systemic Infection 9. H/O IV Drug Use 10. Cancer
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Degenerative disc disease (DDD) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
-
New York University Langone Health
New York, New York, 10016, United States
-
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, 19020, United States
-
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Two-Pronged surgical approach beat standard surgery for neck pain?
- Spine surgery devices under the microscope: do they really work?
- Spine device study ends early with only 4 patients
- New bone graft material under scrutiny in 1,000-Patient spine study
- Back pain breakthrough? study pits two key surgeries against each other
- Injectable hydrogel could ease back pain without surgery