Please sign in to follow a disease.
Which spinal anesthetic works best for C-Sections?
NCT ID NCT06680167
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two spinal anesthetics—prilocaine and bupivacaine—in 142 women having planned C-sections. Researchers measured how quickly each drug caused numbness and muscle relaxation, and how long those effects lasted. The goal was to see if prilocaine could be a good alternative to the standard bupivacaine.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- hyperbaric prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%
- What this could lead to
- If prilocaine works as well as bupivacaine, it could offer a faster-recovering option for spinal anesthesia during C-sections.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study (142 women) comparing two drugs already in use. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Early phase 1
The earliest testing in people: a first look at safety, in a very small group.
- Participants
-
142 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2024
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Women aged 18-45 years. 2. Patients with uncomplicated pregnancies. 3. American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II. 4. Height between 155 cm and 175 cm. 5. Written informed consent provided. - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with known allergies to local anesthetics. 2. Contraindications to intrathecal anesthesia (e.g., infection at the injection site and coagulopathy). 3. Severe preeclampsia or eclampsia. 4. Presence of significant comorbidities (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, renal or hepatic dysfunction). 5. History of spinal surgery or significant spinal deformity. 6. Patients who refuse to participate in the study -
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Spinal anesthesia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sohag University Hospitals
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, 82749, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a common steroid stretch spinal anesthesia and keep surgery patients comfortable longer?
- Can a One-Sided spinal block keep blood pressure steadier during hip surgery?
- Can a slower oxytocin infusion prevent dangerous blood pressure drops in C-Sections?
- Which spinal anesthetic gets you back on your feet sooner?
- Can ultrasound make spinal anesthesia safer for the elderly?
- Can AI-Guided ultrasound make spinal anesthesia safer?