Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Braces breakthrough? new study tests two ways to move teeth faster

NCT ID NCT07658235

First seen Jun 19, 2026 · Last updated Jun 19, 2026

Summary

This study compares two techniques to speed up the movement of upper canine teeth during orthodontic treatment: micro-osteoperforation (creating tiny holes in the jawbone) and photobiomodulation (low-level laser therapy). 75 people needing premolar extractions as part of braces will be randomly assigned to one of these methods or standard care. The main goal is to see which approach moves the canine tooth fastest in the first month and until the gap closes.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MAXILLARY CANINE RETRACTION are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • University of Kufa College of Dentistry

    Najaf, Kufa, 54001, Iraq

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Micro-osteoperforation (tiny holes in jawbone) and photobiomodulation (low-level laser light)

What this could lead to

If successful, these techniques could shorten the time needed for braces by accelerating tooth movement, making orthodontic treatment faster and more comfortable.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial (75 people) comparing two methods against standard care. Results may not apply to all patients, and the procedures may not be widely available or covered by insurance.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Malocclusion

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.