Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Sling angle may improve incontinence surgery success

NCT ID NCT07530484

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 184 women with stress urinary incontinence who had a single-incision sling surgery. Researchers compared two sling insertion angles—one acute and one standard—to see which led to better cure rates and quality of life at 6 months. The goal is to find the best angle for surgical success.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
single-incision midurethral sling surgery
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help surgeons choose the best sling angle to improve cure rates and quality of life for women with stress urinary incontinence.
What could go wrong
This is a completed study with 184 participants, so results are available but may not apply to all patients or sling types. The angle difference is small, and outcomes may vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

184 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Oct 2017

Finished

Oct 2019

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Adult female patients diagnosed with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence who underwent single-incision midurethral sling surgery at a tertiary medical center. All procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon, and patients had available follow-up data for at least 6 months.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients aged 18 years or older * Diagnosis of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) * Preoperative 1-hour pad test \>10 g * Undergoing single-incision midurethral sling surgery (ContaSure Needleless system) * Availability of complete clinical and follow-up data for at least 6 months Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of detrusor overactivity on urodynamic study * Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge symptoms * Voiding dysfunction * History of prior pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery * Neurological disorders affecting lower urinary tract function * Pelvic organ prolapse stage ≥ III (POP-Q classification)

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Female stress urinary incontinence are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

female stress incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

    Taipei, Taiwan, 111, Taiwan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.