Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which Hand-On fix works best for pelvic pain? new trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07176169

Symptom relief Sponsor: Foundation University Islamabad Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two types of hands-on therapy (Muscle Energy Techniques) for people with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, a common cause of lower back and pelvic pain. Fifty adults aged 18 to 50 will receive either innominate rotation correction or sacral torsion correction, plus standard care like heat or cold packs and exercises. The goal is to see which technique better reduces pain and improves daily function over 4 weeks.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Muscle Energy Technique (manual therapy)
What this could lead to
If this trial succeeds, it could show which manual therapy technique works best for sacroiliac joint pain, helping clinicians choose the most effective treatment.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 50 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and the benefit over standard care is uncertain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 50 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Dec 2025

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 50 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Dysfunction based on at least 3 of the following tests * Distraction Test * Compression Test * Gaenslen's Test * Thigh Thrust Test * Sacral Thrust Test * Presence of Pain in Buttock, Posterior Pelvis, or Lower Lumbar Region for more than 2 weeks * Confirmed Pelvic Asymmetry through Palpation (i.e., ASIS/PSIS Landmarks, Gillet's Test) Exclusion Criteria: * • History of Lumbar or Pelvic Fracture, Recent Surgery, or Hip/Knee Pathology affecting Gait/Posture. * Pregnancy or Post-partum less than 6 months - due to Hormonal Laxity \& Altered Biomechanics * Systemic Inflammatory conditions - Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis * Neurological Deficits - Cauda Equina Syndrome, Radiculopathy with Motor Loss * Ongoing Physiotherapy treatment for Low Back Pain in past 4 weeks * Inability/Contraindications to tolerate Manual Therapy - Osteoporosis * Leg Length Discrepancy - \>1.5 cm or Structural Scoliosis * BMI \> 35 (ASIA) - it may affect assessment validity due to obesity

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sacroiliac joint dysfunction are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

    Islamabad, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.