Shoulder surgery showdown: onlay vs. inlay – which works better?
NCT ID NCT05297305
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two different ways surgeons place the top part of a reverse shoulder replacement: sitting on top of the bone (onlay) or set into the bone (inlay). The goal was to see if one method leads to better arm movement after surgery. The study enrolled 19 people with shoulder arthritis or rotator cuff injuries, but it was stopped early, so results are limited.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
19 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the following components: 1. Onlay group: Ascend Flex stem, Perform Reversed standard +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36 mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere 2. Inlay group: Perform Stem Reverse, Perform Reversed +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere * Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or primary osteoarthritis with cuff tear * Negative external rotation lag sign, ability to externally rotate beyond neutral * Age 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: * Revision arthroplasty * Prior open shoulder surgery * Concomitant tendon transfer (Latissimus Dorsi, Pectoralis Tendon, Lower Trapezius) * Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability * Patients not willing to undergo a standardized physical therapy protocol or home therapy program after surgical intervention * Patient anatomy does not accommodate the study implants per surgeon discretion * Pregnant, patient-reported * Minors (under 18 years of age) * Cognitively impaired based on a diagnosis of dementia, psychiatric disorder, or any cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent or answering of study questionnaires
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Arthritis shoulder are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two shoulder implants, one question: which restores function best?
- Can your beliefs about pain shape your shoulder disability?
- Could core strength hold the key to shoulder recovery?
- Could a simple steroid injection replace a catheter for shoulder surgery pain?
- Patch aims to cut rotator cuff Re-Tear rate after surgery
- Shoulder surgery debate: to repair or not to repair the rotator cuff?