Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which numbing method works best for lung surgery pain?

NCT ID NCT07063602

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests three different methods of numbing the chest (paravertebral block) to see which provides the best pain relief after video-assisted lung surgery. Researchers will check how much sensation is lost in the chest area using ice and a special filament. The goal is to find out if poor pain relief is due to the numbing technique not working or other factors, so doctors can improve pain management for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
paravertebral block with local anesthetic
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors choose the best paravertebral block method to better control pain after lung surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study focused on measuring anesthesia areas, not on proving long-term pain relief. Results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 90 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Sep 2025

Expected to finish

Sep 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients scheduled for elective anatomical pulmonary resection by VATS at two institutions

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 years and older * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-3 Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication to the paravertebral block (coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents other than aspirin that have not been stopped according to hospital guidelines, thoracoscopic visualization of the paravertebral space expected to be difficult or impossible, anterior spinal surgery with potential discontinuity of the paravertebral space) * Epidural analgesia preferred (high risk of thoracotomy, marginal lung function) * Surgical criteria: conversion to thoracotomy necessary and thoracic epidural or other form of regional analgesia implemented post-operatively * Known allergy to local anesthetics * Language barrier, psychiatric, physical or mental condition making pain assessment impossible despite prior education * Pregnancy * Patient refusal to participate

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Lung cancer are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

    RECRUITING

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.