Robot vs. doctor: which lung biopsy method is more accurate?
NCT ID NCT07500818
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether using a robotic arm during a lung biopsy helps doctors get better tissue samples to diagnose interstitial lung disease. About 30 adults with unclear CT scans will be randomly assigned to either standard or robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. The goal is to see which method leads to a clearer diagnosis.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years * Clinical suspicion of interstitial lung disease requiring histological confirmation * Non-diagnostic HRCT pattern (e.g. probable UIP or indeterminate pattern) * Candidate for transbronchial lung cryobiopsy * Ability to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Definite UIP pattern on HRCT * Severe pulmonary hypertension * Severe hypoxemia contraindicating bronchoscopy * Coagulopathy or contraindication to biopsy * Pregnancy * Inability to provide informed consent
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Interstitial lung disease (ILD) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne
RECRUITINGLucerne, Canton of Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland
-
University Hospital Zurich
RECRUITINGZurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a common steroid shield breast cancer patients from a dangerous drug side effect?
- Can laser guidance make lung biopsies safer and more accurate?
- Can a single X-Ray predict lung biopsy safety and speed up discharge?
- Sharper CT scans may solve a lung disease diagnostic puzzle
- Drones may rush donor lungs to transplant patients, saving precious time
- Can a smartphone app replace hospital rehab for lung disease?