Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New study asks: do all struggling newborns need breathing machines?

NCT ID NCT07390812

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This pilot study looks at whether full-term newborns with mild breathing problems can safely transition without a breathing tube called CPAP. Researchers will observe 22 babies born via scheduled C-section who show mild signs like flaring nostrils or light grunting. Half will receive standard CPAP care, while the other half will be monitored closely without it, only receiving CPAP if their condition worsens. The goal is to see if avoiding CPAP is safe and reduces complications like lung air leaks.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Transition without Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that some newborns with mild breathing issues do not need CPAP, potentially reducing medical interventions and risks like pneumothorax.
What could go wrong
This is a very small early-phase pilot study with only 22 infants, so results may not apply broadly. The approach may fail if babies' breathing worsens without CPAP.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Early phase 1

The earliest testing in people: a first look at safety, in a very small group.

Participants

22 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2023

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

37 to 41 weeks

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Full term infants (37 weeks + 0days to 41 weeks +6days gestational age) * Born via scheduled c-sections without labor * Who develop mild respiratory distress, defined as nasal flaring or, intermittent grunting, and/or mild retractions and/or +/- mild tachypnea ( respiratory rate 61-90). Exclusion Criteria: * Moderate to severe respiratory distress (continuous grunting, or moderate retractions or respiratory rate greater than 90 breaths per minute), * need for positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or advanced resuscitation in the first 5 minutes of life, * meconium stained amniotic fluid, * major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Mild respiratory distress are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hackensack Univeristy Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.