Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a quick ultrasound replace X-Rays for osteoporosis diagnosis?

NCT ID NCT06371755

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares a new ultrasound technology called REMS with the standard DXA scan for measuring bone density. Researchers will enroll 296 women aged 30-80 to see if REMS is as accurate and reliable as DXA, but without using radiation. If it works, it could offer a faster, safer way to diagnose osteoporosis.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Ultrasound examination with REMS technology (device)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could provide a safer, radiation-free way to diagnose osteoporosis, making bone density testing easier and more accessible.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage comparison study, not a treatment trial. The new method may not be as accurate as DXA, and results may not apply to men or people with severe obesity.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 296 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Nov 2019

Expected to finish

Dec 2025

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

30 to 80 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * patients scheduled for lumbar and/or femoral DXA examination, * female sex, * age range 30-80 years (for repeatability study), age range 50-70 years (for accuracy study), * absence of severe obesity (BMI \< 40 kg/m2), * absence of severe walking difficulties, * cognitive underwriting of informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Male sex, * severe walking difficulties, * age below 30 years or over 80 years, * severe obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m2), * declared pregnancy.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Osteoporosis diagnosis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

    RECRUITING

    Milan, MI, 20157, Italy

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.