Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which anesthesia leads to faster recovery after varicose vein procedure?

NCT ID NCT07514000

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at 40 adults undergoing radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins to compare two types of regional anesthesia: spinal anesthesia and a fascia iliaca block. The goal was to see which method leads to better recovery quality, less pain, and faster mobility after the procedure. Researchers measured recovery using a questionnaire and pain scores.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors choose the best anesthesia method for faster, more comfortable recovery after varicose vein treatment.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed observational study with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It compares two anesthesia methods, not a new treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

40 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2024

Finished

Jul 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients undergoing varicose vein surgery at Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Hospital

Ages

18 to 65 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age Profile: Adults aged between 18 and 65 years. * Physical Status: Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I, II, or III. * Informed Consent: Patients who voluntarily agreed to participate and provided written informed consent. * Cognitive Status: Patients who were conscious, oriented, and capable of cooperating with the pain assessment scales (NRS) and the QoR-40 questionnaire. Exclusion Criteria: * Venous Pathology: Presence of deep venous insufficiency (e.g., iliac or femoral vein obstruction, iliac vein stenosis) or acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremity. * Systemic Diseases: Combined cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal dysfunction. * Hematological Disorders: Coagulation disorders or active bleeding diathesis. * Neurological/Cognitive Status: Presence of dementia, cognitive impairment, or inability to cooperate during the procedure. * Local Contraindications: Active infection at the site of the regional anesthesia intervention or surgical field. * Patient Refusal: Patients who declined regional anesthesia or had a known allergy to local anesthetics.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Radiofrequency ablation are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

varicose disease

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Radiofrequency ablation Regional anaesthesia Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block Varicose veins

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Hospital

    Zonguldak, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.