Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Can unpredictable balance drills make tennis players faster and more stable?

NCT ID NCT07590674

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Ibadat International University, Islamabad Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tests whether reactive balance training—using unpredictable movements that force quick corrections—improves dynamic stability and agility more than standard balance exercises in competitive tennis players aged 18-25. Sixty-four participants will be split into two groups and train for six weeks. Researchers will measure balance with the Y-Balance Test and agility with the 505 Agility Test before and after training to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Reactive balance training (unpredictable perturbation-based exercises) versus conventional balance training (static and controlled exercises)
What this could lead to
If reactive balance training proves more effective, it could give tennis coaches a better way to improve players' balance and agility, potentially reducing injury risk and enhancing performance.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 64 participants, so results may not apply to all athletes. The training is non-drug, so risks are low, but the benefit over conventional training may be small or nonexistent.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 64 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

May 2026

Expected to finish

Jul 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 25 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years. * Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience. * Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session). Exclusion Criteria: * Recent injury (last 3 months) * Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders * Previous surgery * Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period. * Use of ankle/knee braces or orthotic devices that may influence balance performance.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Athletic performance are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Athletic performance Dynamic stability Postural balance

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui)

    RECRUITING

    Islamabad, 46000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.