Simpler prostate procedure may help elderly men ditch catheters
NCT ID NCT04006431
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 50 elderly men with an enlarged prostate who needed a urinary catheter. Doctors compared blocking blood flow to one side of the prostate versus both sides. The goal was to see if the simpler one-sided procedure could help patients stop using catheters just as well as the two-sided approach.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- prostate artery embolization (a procedure to block blood flow to the prostate)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a simpler one-sided procedure works as well as the more complex two-sided approach, reducing procedure time and risk for elderly patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, retrospective observational study (not a randomized trial), so results may be less reliable. The patients have severe artery disease, which could limit how well the procedure works.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
50 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2019
- Finished
-
Dec 2022
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Elderly patients (\>70 years of age) with contraindications to surgery, chronically probed
- Ages
-
70 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Elderly patients (\>70 years old) * with contraindications to surgery, * with a chronic urinary catheterization Exclusion Criteria: * \<70 years old * without contraindications to surgery * without chronic urinary catheterization
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Benign prostatic hyperplasia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- One surgery or two? trial tests prostate removal during bladder stone operation
- Laser prostate surgery that spares ejaculation put to a Five-Year test
- Virtual basket laser mode put to the test for faster prostate surgery
- Steam therapy vs. surgery: can a less invasive fix help men with blocked urine flow?
- Listening to patients: a new way to guide prostate treatment?
- A surgical twist that could save ejaculation during prostate surgery