Shock wave vs vibration: which soothes heel pain best?
NCT ID NCT07463794
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two treatments for plantar fasciitis, a common cause of heel pain: shock wave therapy and whole body vibration. Sixty adults with heel pain for at least 4 weeks were randomly assigned to one of the treatments. The goal was to see which better reduces pain and improves foot function.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and whole body vibration therapy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that vibration therapy is a good alternative to shock wave therapy for reducing heel pain and improving foot function.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and neither treatment is a cure—they aim to ease symptoms temporarily.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Mar 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 65 years * Clinically diagnosed plantar fasciitis * Heel pain lasting at least 4 weeks * Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * History of inflammatory rheumatic diseases * Previous foot or ankle surgery * Major trauma to the foot or ankle * Neurological or vascular disorders of the lower extremities * Pregnancy or lactation * Corticosteroid injection to the foot within the last 3 months * Physical therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, or whole body vibration therapy within the last 3 months
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Calcaneal spur are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34245, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Heel pain Face-Off: nerve zapping vs. Blood-Based injection vs. both
- Tape or stretch? trial tests two ways to ease heel pain
- Nature trails may be a new prescription for foot pain
- Can 3D-Printed insoles beat milled ones for heel pain?
- Blood marker may shed light on stubborn heel pain
- Can a CBD cream soothe heel pain fast?