All-in-One stent aims to prevent strokes during artery procedure
NCT ID NCT05845710
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested a new device that combines a stent, a filter to catch debris, and a balloon in one system for treating narrowed carotid arteries. It involved 178 patients at high risk for standard surgery. The main goal was to see if the device reduces the chance of stroke, heart attack, or death within 30 days.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Neuroguard IEP Direct System (a carotid stent with an integrated embolic filter and post-dilation balloon)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this device could offer a safer way to open blocked carotid arteries in patients who are too high-risk for traditional surgery, potentially reducing stroke risk.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-arm study with no comparison group, so results may not prove superiority over existing treatments. The device is new, and long-term safety data are not yet available.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
178 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2023
- Finished
-
Aug 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 82 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
General Inclusion Criteria 1. Male and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female subjects whose age is ≥ 20 or ≤ 82 years of age. 2. Subject is willing and capable of complying with and understands all study protocol requirements, including the specified follow-up visits, and can be contacted by telephone. 3. Subject has signed a written informed consent form that has been approved by the local governing Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site. 4. Subject is diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis treatable with carotid artery stenting via direct carotid access and is considered a high operative risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). 5. Subject is diagnosed with either: 1. Symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as determined by angiography, CTA, or duplex ultrasound. Symptomatic is defined as having stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the ipsilateral hemisphere supplied by the target vessel carotid lesion or ipsilateral transient monocular blindness (amaurosis fugax) within 180 days prior to the procedure; or 2. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 70% as determined by angiography, CTA, or duplex ultrasound. 6. Subject has a lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or common carotid artery (CCA). 7. Subject has a modified Rankin Scale of ≤ 2 at the time of procedure. 8. Females of child-bearing potential have a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to the index procedure. 9. Subject is willing and able to take dual anti platelet therapy for a minimum of 30 days following the index procedure. 10. Subject meets at least one physiologic or one anatomic high-risk criteria. Anatomic High-Risk Conditions for CEA 1\. Target lesion at or above C2 (level of jaw). 2. Prior head and neck surgery in the region of the carotid artery. 3. Tracheostomy or tracheostoma. 4. Surgically inaccessible lesion or hostile neck which the investigator deems safe for direct carotid access including but not limited to: 1. Prior neck irradiation 2. Radial neck dissection 3. Cervical spine immobility 5. Prior ipsilateral CEA. 6. Prior cranial nerve injury. 7. Severe tandem lesions. 8. Occlusion of the contralateral CCA or ICA. 9. Severe bilateral ICA stenosis. Physiological High-Risk Conditions for CEA 1. Subject is ≥ 70 years of age (maximum 80 years) at the time of enrollment. 2. Subject has NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF). 3. Subject has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with FEV1 \< 50, on intermittent or chronic oxygen therapy, or a resting PO2 of ≤ 60 mmHg (room air). 4 Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. 5. Subject has angina class 3 or 4 or unstable angina. 6. Subject has a history of recent myocardial infarction (between 30 days and 6 weeks prior to index the procedure). 7\. Subject has coronary artery disease with two or more vessels with ≥ 70% stenosis. 8\. Subject has planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or peripheral vascular surgery between 31 and 60 days after index procedure. 9\. Subject has restenosis following a prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 1. Subject has a lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or common carotid artery (CCA). 2. Single de novo or restenotic (post carotid endarterectomy \[CEA\]) target lesion or severe tandem lesions that can be covered by a single Neuroguard stent. 3. Target lesion is treatable with a single stent of up to 40 mm in length. 4. Index vessel diameter (segment covered by the mid-portion of the stent) is between 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm at the site of the target lesion. 5. Distal vessel diameter at the site of Neuroguard filter deployment is between 4.0 mm and 7.0 mm. 6. Distal common carotid artery diameter (segment covered by proximal portion of the stent) is between 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm. 7. Sufficient landing zone exists in the cervical internal carotid artery distal to the target lesion to allow for the safe and successful deployment of the integrated Neuroguard filter. 8. At least 5 cm of atherosclerosis free space in the ipsilateral common carotid artery between the sheath insertion site and the proximal edge of the target lesion. 9. Common carotid artery reference diameter is at least 6 mm. 10. Target vessel must meet diameter requirements as set forth in the Neuroguard IEP Direct System Instructions for Use (IFU). General Exclusion Criteria 1. Life expectancy of less than one year in the opinion of the investigator at the time of enrollment. 2. Currently requiring an organ transplantation. 3. An evolving acute stroke 4. Anticipated or existing potential sources of emboli including left ventricular aneurysm, aortic or mitral mechanical heart valve, severe calcific aortic stenosis (valve area \< 1.0 cm2), endocarditis, moderate to severe mitral stenosis, known previously symptomatic patent foramen ovale (PFO), left atrial thrombus, any intracardiac mass. 5. Deep being thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated within the past 12 months. 6. Recently (\< 60 days) implanted heart valve. 7. Subject has experienced any episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter within the past 6 months or has a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter requiring chronic anticoagulation. 8. History of chronic atrial flutter or chronic atrial fibrillation. 9. Anticoagulation with Phenprocoumon (Marcumar®), warfarin, direct thrombin inhibitors, or anti-Xa agents within 14 days of the index procedure. 10. Subject with a known hypercoaguable state. 11. Acute febrile illness (temperature ≥ 100.4°F or 38°C) or active infection. 12. Subject with a SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection within 21 days prior to the index procedure. 13. Acute myocardial infarction \< 30 days prior to index procedure. 14. Any major surgical procedure (i.e., intraabdominal or intrathoracic surgery or any surgery / interventional procedure involving cardiac or vascular system) 30 days prior to or within 30 days following the index procedure. 15. History of disabling stroke with substantial residual disability (modified Rankin score ≥ 3). 16. Subject has had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or amaurosis fugax within 48 hours prior to the index procedure. 17. Known severe carotid stenosis contralateral to the target lesion requiring treatment within 30 days of the index procedure. 18. Any other neurological deficit not due to stroke that may confound neurological assessments. 19. Subject has contralateral laryngeal or vagus nerve injury. 20. Subject has severe dementia. 21. Subject has intracranial tumor. 22. Known hypersensitivity to nitinol or its components (e.g., nickel, titanium). 23. History of intracranial hemorrhage within the 12 months prior to the index procedure. 24. History of gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within 30 days prior to the index procedure that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy. 25. Any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes direct carotid artery access unsafe (e.g., severe hepatic impairment, malignant hypertension, morbid obesity). 26. Subject has less than 5 cm between the direct carotid access site and the proximal edge of the target lesion. 27. Known hypersensitivity to contrast media that cannot be adequately premedicated. 28. Hemoglobin (Hgb) \< 8 gm/dL, platelet count \< 100,000, international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 (irreversible), or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. 29. Chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL or estimated GFR \< 30 cc/min) or end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis on the day of the index procedure. 30. History or current indication of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy including thrombocytopenia or an inability to receive heparin in amounts sufficient to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) at ≥ 250 seconds, or uncorrectable severe anemia. 31. Contraindication, intollerance or allergy to standard of care study medications, including antiplatelet therapy or aspirin. 32. Previously enrolled in this study or currently enrolled in another interventional device or drug study that has not yet reached the primary endpoint. 33. Potential for subject non-compliance with protocol-required follow up or antiplatelet medication in the opinion of the investigator. 34. Subject is otherwise unsuitable for intervention or surgery in the opinion of the investigator. Angiographic Exclusion Criteria 1. Total occlusion of the target carotid artery. 2. Previously placed stent in the target vessel or the planned arteriotomy site. 3. Excessive circumferential calcification of the target lesion, defined as \> 3 mm of thickness of calcification seen in orthogonal views on fluoroscopy or on CTA. 4. Qualitative characteristics of ipsilateral common carotid artery, ipsilateral external carotid artery, or target lesion that preclude or make difficult the safe introduction of the direct access sheath. 5. Angiographic evidence of a mobile filling defect or fresh thrombus in the target carotid artery. 6. Presence of "string sign" of the target lesion (a sub-totally occluded, long segment of the true lumen of the artery with markedly reduced contrast flow). 7. Non-atherosclerotic carotid stenosis (e.g., dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia). 8. Proximal/ostial CCA stenosis ≥ 50% or intracranial stenosis more severe than the target lesion. 9. Subject in whom direct carotid access is not possible, including severe tortuosity or stenosis that requires additional endovascular procedures or that prevents safe and expeditious vascular access. 10. Subject with intracranial pathology, that in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient inappropriate for study participation (e.g., arteriovenous malformation, intracranial tumor, microangiopathy or large vessel cerebral vascular disease, etc.) or that would confound the neurological evaluation. 11. Angiographic, CT, MR or ultrasound evidence of atherosclerosis of the common carotid artery that would preclude or make difficult safe placement of the sheath and other endovascular devices to the target artery as needed for carotid stenting. 12. Angiographic, CT, MR or ultrasound evidence of severe tortuosity of the cervical internal carotid artery. Severe vascular tortuosity is defined as 2 or more bends of 90 degrees or more within 4 cm of the target lesion. 13. Angiographic, CT, MR or ultrasound evidence of angulation or tortuosity (≥ 90 degree) of the common carotid artery (CCA) that will transmit a severe loop to the internal carotid after sheath placement. 14. Subject with \> 50% stenosis in the common carotid artery (CCA) proximal to the target lesion.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Carotid artery diseases are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AdventHealth Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
-
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
-
Atrium Health - Sanger Heart and Vascular
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
-
Baylor Scott and White Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
-
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
-
Delray Medical Center
Delray Beach, Florida, 33484, United States
-
GH Paris St. Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
-
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
-
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States
-
Honor Health
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
-
Hopital Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France
-
Indiana University Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
-
Manatee Memorial Hospital
Bradenton, Florida, 34208, United States
-
McLaren Center for Research and Innovation
Bay City, Michigan, 48708, United States
-
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
-
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
-
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
-
Mount Sinai Vascular Institute
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140, United States
-
North Carolina Heart and Vascular Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
-
Northwell Health
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
-
OhioHealth Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214, United States
-
Prisma Health
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
-
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
-
Sisters of Charity Hospital
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
-
Southcoast Health
New Bedford, Massachusetts, 02720, United States
-
St. David's Healthcare
Austin, Texas, 78756, United States
-
St. Francis Hospital
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
-
TriHealth (Bethesda North Hospital)
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
-
UNC Hospital
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
-
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
-
University at Buffalo Neurosurgery - Jacobs Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14203, United States
-
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-5545, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can powerful cholesterol drugs remodel dangerous artery plaques?
- Ultrasound technique aims to spot Stroke-Prone plaque
- Can a forehead light sensor spot hidden brain oxygen drops during carotid surgery?
- Could a stent double the chance of a good recovery after severe stroke?
- New PET tracer could spot dangerous plaques before they cause strokes
- Personalizing blood thinners after carotid stenting could prevent heart attacks and strokes