Plastic vs. metal: which denture material wins for comfort and cost?
NCT ID NCT06789627
First seen Jul 29, 2026 · Last updated Jul 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether a plastic-like material called PEEK, used to make partial dentures with digital design and milling, can match or beat traditional metal dentures. Thirty adults with missing lower back teeth on both sides will receive one type of denture. Researchers will measure how each affects quality of life and overall cost.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- a PEEK (polyether ether ketone) removable partial denture framework made by CAD/CAM
- What this could lead to
- If PEEK dentures work as well as metal ones, they could offer a more comfortable, lighter, and metal-free option for people with partial tooth loss.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. PEEK may not be as durable or fit as well as metal.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2021
- Finished
-
Apr 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with bilateral free end saddles in the mandible (Kennedy class I) with the last standing abutment second premolar * Opposing dentition is fully intact or restored to be intact * Adequate inter-arch space of at least 7mm * Angle's class I maxilla-mandibular relationship * Patients with no periodontal disease and good oral hygiene * Cooperative patients showing motivation to follow-up Exclusion Criteria: * Periodontal affection of the abutment teeth * Skeletal mal-relationship * Unmotivated patients to maintain adequate oral hygiene and to follow up---- ---- Patients with neuro-mascular disorders * Systemic disease affecting periodontal health like uncontrolled diabetes
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Oral health-related quality of life are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Giza Governorate, 0, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new dental implant design keep jawbone and gums healthier?
- Can All-Ceramic bridges survive the forces of chewing?
- Blood and gel combo may strengthen dental implant bone growth
- Can a Glued-On zirconia bridge replace a missing tooth without implants?
- Can dental implants be placed right after sinus grafting?
- Can a single drill match full computer guidance for dental implants?