New study aims to pinpoint safe observation time for kids after anaphylaxis
NCT ID NCT07231393
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked back at the medical records of 67 children treated for anaphylaxis in a Turkish emergency department over 10 years. Researchers wanted to know how long kids were observed and how often a second wave of symptoms (biphasic reaction) occurred. They also looked for risk factors like delayed epinephrine use or asthma. The goal is to improve guidelines for safe observation times in children.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors know how long to observe children after anaphylaxis and which kids need extra monitoring.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center review of past records, so results may not apply to all children or emergency settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
67 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
May 2014
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Children and adolescents (\<18 years) who presented to the Pediatric Emergency Department of Adnan Menderes University Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2024, with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis.
- Ages
-
0 months to 17 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Age \<18 years * Diagnosis of anaphylaxis according to World Allergy Organization (WAO) 2020 criteria * Complete clinical data available in medical records Exclusion Criteria: * Incomplete or missing clinical data * Cases not meeting WAO 2020 anaphylaxis definition * Patients presenting with isolated urticaria or localized allergic reactions only
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anaphylaxis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a VR headset replace drugs for Kids' circumcision pain?
- Cleaner classroom air may strengthen children's hearts and lungs
- Could a WeChat app add minutes to your child's sleep?
- Can a simple training program slash home accidents in toddlers?
- Robotic fish vs. real fish: a soothing distraction for kids in pain?
- Can a cartoon or stress ball take the fear out of a Child's enema?