Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New training approach aims to boost success rates for emergency intubation

NCT ID NCT07146984

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only This study
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study tests whether a structured training program based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle helps emergency medicine residents become better at inserting breathing tubes (tracheal intubation). The program includes lectures, simulations, supervised practice, and feedback. Researchers will compare first-attempt success rates and safety outcomes between residents trained with the PDCA method and those who received standard training.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
PDCA cycle-based educational training program
What this could lead to
If it works, this could point toward a more effective way to train doctors in a critical emergency procedure, potentially reducing patient complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study comparing two time periods, so results may not apply to other hospitals. The training method may not significantly improve skills over standard approaches.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 100 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Oct 2024

Expected to finish

Sep 2025

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Emergency medicine residents from the Department of Emergency, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, China. Participants were postgraduate residents rotating in the emergency department during the study period and were required to perform tracheal intubation as part of their clinical training.

Ages

25 to 45 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Emergency medicine residents rotating in the emergency department during the study period. * Residents who are required to perform tracheal intubation as part of clinical training. * Residents who have completed baseline theoretical and simulation-based airway management training. * Voluntary participation with written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * • Residents who refuse to participate or withdraw consent. * Residents with prior advanced airway fellowship training or extensive intubation experience (\>50 independent intubations). * Residents who are unable to complete the full PDCA-based training program due to absence or rotation schedule. * Any medical condition or circumstance deemed by investigators to interfere with participation or data integrity.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Medical education are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511000, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.