Heart calcium showdown: which device wins?
NCT ID NCT06736665
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two medical devices used to break up hard calcium deposits in heart arteries before placing a stent. It involves 50 adults with coronary artery disease who will be randomly assigned to receive either orbital atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy. The goal is to see which technique leads to better stent placement and fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Orbital atherectomy device or intravascular lithotripsy device
- What this could lead to
- If this trial succeeds, it could show which device is safer and more effective for treating tough calcium deposits in heart arteries, improving outcomes for patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry risks like vessel damage or heart attack.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 50 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jun 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years. 2. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease with calcified nodules identified by OCT in a native vessel, eligible for percutaneous coronary revascularization. 3. Clinical presentation of chronic coronary syndrome or acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation\*. 4. Distal vessel reference diameters ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.0 mm. \* Non-culprit lesions eligible for revascularization in a staged procedure following a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are considered for inclusion. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome with ST elevation. 2. Left main disease. 3. In-stent restenosis lesions. 4. Critical stenoses where it is not possible to advance the OCT catheter across the lesion after predilation with a balloon of up to 2 mm in diameter. 5. Lesion involving a bifurcation with a secondary branch diameter ≥2 mm. 6. Cardiogenic shock. 7. Patients requiring cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve intervention within three months before or after angioplasty. 8. Pregnancy. 9. Life expectancy of less than one year. 10. Contraindication for the use of appropriate antiplatelet therapy post-revascularization. 11. Coronary artery disease with an indication for surgical revascularization. 12. Advanced chronic kidney disease or anatomical characteristics that contraindicate the use of optical coherence tomography. 13. Inability to obtain informed consent. 14. Allergy to eggs or soy, contraindicating the use of OA.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
6 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
RECRUITINGValladolid, Valladolid, 47003, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario General de Alicante
RECRUITINGAlicante, Alicante, 03010, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
RECRUITINGLugo, Lugo, 27003, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
RECRUITINGMadrid, Madrid, 28034, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba
RECRUITINGCórdoba, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
RECRUITINGSalamanca, Salamanca, 37007, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can VR lessons help heart patients take their medicines?
- Can a shorter course of two blood thinners keep stents safe?
- Can a shorter course of blood thinners work after Metal-Free heart balloons?
- Heart arteries without metal: CT scans track Drug-Coated balloon results
- A tailored coaching plan may keep heart patients on track after hospital discharge
- A 7,000-Person trial asks: is lifelong aspirin necessary for older hearts?