Can a mirror and mild zaps restore arm movement after stroke?
NCT ID NCT04913506
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study tested whether adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to mirror therapy improves arm function in people with hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis). 42 participants were split into three groups: mirror therapy alone, NMES alone, or both combined. The goal was to see if the combo offered extra benefits for movement, daily activities, and pain.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and mirror therapy
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a better rehabilitation approach for regaining arm movement after stroke.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 42 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The therapy is also time-intensive and requires a practitioner.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
42 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2021
- Finished
-
Jan 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subacute hemiplegia * Patients who can communicate well, are motivated enough and are willing to participate in the study * Patients' medical conditions are stable * Initiation of voluntary extension movement in the wrist (lower limit) Exclusion Criteria: * The presence of more than one previous cerebrovascular disease (except transient ischemic attack). * Presence of flaccid hemiplegia. * Presence of a previous neurological disease causing a decrease in strength in the affected extremity. * Presence of deformity due to a previous fracture, inflammatory arthropathy, etc. in the affected extremity. * Presence of more than grade 3 spasticity in upper extremity according to Modified Ashworth Scale * Use of cardiac pace maker * Presence of fatal cardiac arrhythmia * Presence of seizure history within 2 years.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hemiplegia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Bursa, 16320, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Ultrasound of calf muscles could reveal who is at risk of falling after stroke
- Could digital skills help stroke survivors rejoin community life?
- Turning play into therapy: Ride-On toys may boost arm strength in kids with hemiplegia
- Can a smart foot device retrain walking after hemiplegia?
- Electric suit aims to ease spasticity and boost balance in kids with cerebral palsy
- Which therapy restores walking after stroke? a Head-to-Head test