Neck pain showdown: joint mobilization vs. strengthening exercises
NCT ID NCT06960525
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two physical therapy treatments for people with chronic neck pain: joint mobilization (gentle, hands-on movements) and strengthening exercises. Twenty-six adults with neck pain for at least three months received 12 sessions of one treatment. Researchers measured neck movement accuracy, pain levels, and disability to see which approach worked better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- cervical joint mobilization and cervical strengthening exercises
- What this could lead to
- If one treatment proves superior, it could guide physical therapy for chronic neck pain, improving movement and reducing discomfort.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 26 participants. Results may not apply to everyone with neck pain, and neither treatment may be clearly better.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
26 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2024
- Finished
-
Feb 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 to 50 years * Pain ≥ 3 months * Neck pain on VAS ≥ 3/10 * NDI ≥ 5/50 points * ZZ Errors ≥ 9 or the time to complete the task ≥ 28s Exclusion Criteria: * Unilateral headache aggravated by neck movement. * Upper extremity symptoms beyond the elbow. * Any history of neck trauma including whiplash * Recent fractures (last 8 weeks) * Cervical surgery (last 3 months) * Current neck-related dizziness * Known or suspected ves3bular pathology * Internal fixation of the cervical spine * Physical therapy for the neck (last 3 months)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic neck pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Armed Forces Hospital - Al Hada
Ta'if, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can adding exercise or physical therapy to steroid injections better ease chronic neck pain?
- Could neck pain weaken breathing muscles? ultrasound study investigates
- Can a physical exam tell a headache from neck pain?
- Can a nerve-zapping ear device supercharge exercise for neck pain?
- Can a gentle Hands-On technique unlock stiff necks?
- Could a diaphragm massage ease stubborn neck pain?