Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

New shaver device may speed up uterine polyp surgery

NCT ID NCT02472197

Symptom relief Sponsor: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study tested a new device called a hysteroscopic morcellator against the standard resectoscope for removing uterine polyps. The goal was to see which method is faster and safer. The trial involved 90 adults with a single polyp. The morcellator uses suction and mechanical cutting, while the standard tool uses electrical current. Researchers measured surgery time, complications, and how complete the removal was.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Hysteroscopic morcellation procedure
What this could lead to
If successful, this could make polyp removal faster and safer, with fewer risks like uterine perforation.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study (90 participants) comparing two surgical tools, not a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

90 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Sep 2015

Finished

Jul 2018

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * All major patients with single endometrial polyp, * Confirmed by a diagnostic hysteroscopy * Greater than or equal to one centimeter in size with no upper size limit * Patient giving informed consent * Subject belonging to a social security organisme Exclusion Criteria: * Ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding * Progressive malignant gynecological pathology * Evolutionary Genital infection * Suspected malignancy before surgery * Multiple Polyps * Polypoid hyperplasia * Associated submucosal myoma * Person under guardianship * Patient with contraindication to general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia * Person in an exclusion period (determined by a previous or ongoing study) * Inability to give the eprosn informed information (comprehension difficulties ...)

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Endometrial polyps are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

endometrial polyp

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Endometrial polyps

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University Hospital, Strasbourg, france

    Strasbourg, 67000, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.