Which nuss technique is better? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07312448
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two versions of the Nuss surgery for pectus excavatum (sunken chest) in teenagers aged 11 to 18. Researchers will look at 80 patients' records to see which technique leads to shorter surgery, less pain, and better cosmetic results. The goal is to help surgeons pick the best method for future patients.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (modified Nuss technique vs. classic Nuss technique)
- What this could lead to
- If this study finds one technique is better, it could help surgeons choose the best approach for teens with pectus excavatum, leading to shorter operations and better recovery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center retrospective study, not a large randomized trial. Results may not apply to all patients or hospitals, and the study only looks back at past records.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 80 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Dec 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Feb 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients aged 11 to 18 years underwent surgery between 2010 and 2024 using either the classic or modified Nuss technique. - Patient with a Haller index of 2.25 or higher.
- Ages
-
11 to 18 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 11 to 18 years. * Patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2024 using either the classic or modified Nuss technique. - Patient with a Haller index of 2.25 or higher. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a Haller score below 2.25. * Patients who have undergone surgery using alternative techniques such as Ravitch or modified Ravitch. * Patients under 11 years of age or over 19 years of age.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pectus excavatum are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Service de Chirurgie Pédiatrique - Réanimation - CHU de Strasbourg - France
RECRUITINGStrasbourg, 67091, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A dissolving scaffold may help camouflage a sunken chest
- Nerve block showdown: which technique cuts opioid use after chest surgery?
- Absorbable chest scaffold aims to reshape sunken sternum without metal
- Nerve freezing before chest surgery: safe years later?
- Acupressure tested to ease Post-Surgery nausea in chest deformity repair
- Can we predict chronic pain in teens? new study seeks answers