Smaller incision may improve aortic aneurysm surgery outcomes
NCT ID NCT07386028
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques for repairing a chronic ascending aortic aneurysm: the traditional full sternotomy (cutting through the breastbone completely) and a less invasive J-shaped mini-sternotomy (a smaller cut). Researchers will track early and late outcomes in 200 participants, including mortality, delirium, and stroke rates. The goal is to see if the smaller incision leads to better recovery without compromising safety.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one approach proves safer, it could become the preferred surgical method for patients with chronic ascending aortic aneurysm.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational comparison, not a randomized controlled trial, so results may be influenced by patient selection. The study is also relatively small (200 participants).
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 200 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jul 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Signed informed consent. * Ascending aorta greater than 5 cm without involving the aortic arch Exclusion Criteria: * Acute aortic dissection or urgent/emergent cases. * Redo aortic surgery. * Aortic arch surgery. * Concomitant CABG or left ventricle restoration
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ascending aortic aneurysm are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
RECRUITINGTomsk, 634012, Russia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Scientists probe hidden metabolic clues in aortic aneurysms
- Women may face higher risks after aortic aneurysm repair, study suggests
- Aortic aneurysm surgery under the microscope
- New stent grafts aim to fix aortic aneurysms without major surgery
- Heart surgery patients may get new shield against dangerous rhythm
- Scientists hunt for hidden genes behind aortic aneurysms