New surgical stapler proves safe in 430 Real-World procedures
NCT ID NCT05095935
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This registry tracked 430 patients who received surgery with the Signia Small Diameter Reload stapler for chest, belly, or pediatric operations. The goal was to confirm the device works safely in everyday hospital use. Researchers measured how often doctors needed extra steps to stop bleeding or leaks during surgery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
430 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2021
- Finished
-
Oct 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients undergoing surgical procedures during which the Signia Small Diameter Reload is being used for transection of the arteries and veins meeting the cohort criteria.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements * Patient has, or is intended to receive or be treated with, an eligible Medtronic product * Patient is consented within the enrollment window of the therapy received, as applicable Exclusion Criteria: * Patient who is, or is expected to be, inaccessible for follow-up * Patient is excluded by local law * Patient is currently enrolled in, or plans to enroll in, any concurrent drug/device study that may confound the PSR results
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Minimally invasive surgical procedures are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Children's Hospital Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
-
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
-
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
-
Duke University Health Systems
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
-
Mary Washington Hopital
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401, United States
-
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
-
New York Presbyterian Hospital - Colombia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
-
Rush
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
-
The George Washington University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
-
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
-
UPMC Falk Clinic
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
-
University of Texas - San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78249, United States
-
Virginia Cancer Specialists
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Lung imaging could reveal the best anesthetic dose for breast surgery
- Can extra weight complicate colorectal surgery? a new study investigates
- Can a smarter stapler reduce surgical leaks and bleeding?
- A new care pathway aims to get cancer surgery patients home safer and faster
- Radar waves could replace wires for heart monitoring during surgery
- Could a common muscle relaxant cut narcotic use after hysterectomy?